Which statement is not true regarding conservation tillage?

The statement that conservation tillage requires more traffic on a field is not true. In fact, one of the primary benefits of conservation tillage is that it generally results in less field traffic compared to conventional tillage practices. This method minimizes the compaction of soil and damage to soil structure.

Conservation tillage promotes the retention of crop residues on the soil surface, which helps protect the soil from erosion and encourages the development of beneficial soil organisms. The reduced need for tilling means fewer passes over the field with machinery, which decreases soil compaction and traffic. Additionally, less traffic reduces the disturbance of the soil, contributing to its overall health and structure.

Therefore, the idea that conservation tillage increases the necessity for more traffic is a misconception; the practice is designed to optimize soil management while reducing negative impacts, including increased traffic.